Pure MOC Multi-Origin Framework: A Complete Explanation of Mercury’s Perihelion Precession

I. First, pinpoint the common flaw in Newtonian mechanics and general relativity

1. Newtonian system
Assumes the solar system has only the Sun as a single absolute origin, gravity obeys the inverse-square law strictly, orbits are closed perfect ellipses, and there is no inherent extra precession. Thus it cannot explain the observed 43 arcseconds per century discrepancy.
2. General relativity
Still uses a single coordinate origin, merely imposes a curved metric on spacetime, and relies on field equations to numerically fit the result. It is a mathematical patch without a structural cause – a post-hoc fix, not an underlying mechanism.

II. Core premises of MOC (Multi-Origin Cosmology) – only the MOC paradigm

1. The universe has no single absolute origin.
2. Every massive celestial body has its own local inertial origin – the Sun and Mercury each have independent origins.
3. Gravitational interaction is not a simple point-to-point pull, but the mutual superposition and perturbation of curvature fields from two local origins.
4. A small nearby body experiences the most significant coupling effect from the central body's origin curvature field.

III. Physical mechanism of Mercury’s precession in MOC

1. Dual-origin coupling
The Sun has a global dominant curvature origin, Mercury has its own local secondary origin. They do not share the same origin or reference frame. Newton forcibly locks Mercury into the Sun’s single-origin framework; MOC treats them as two mutually anchoring origins.
2. The orbit is not a fixed ellipse but a perturbed drift due to origin coupling
In each revolution, Mercury does not retrace the same closed path. Due to the Sun’s curvature field and Mercury’s own local inertial reference, each orbit has a tiny angular shift. This shift is not from an external force but an intrinsic effect of multi-origin geometry.
3. Perihelion amplification effect
Mercury is the closest planet to the Sun. The curvature gradient between its local origin and the Sun’s primary origin is strongest, and the coupling perturbation is most pronounced. Venus and Earth experience the same type of precession, but because they are farther away, the curvature gradient is weaker and the shift is too small to be easily observed.
4. Long-term accumulation yields the measured precession
Tiny angular shifts per revolution accumulate over years and centuries, eventually matching the astronomically observed perihelion precession of 43 arcseconds per century.

IV. Essential difference between MOC and general relativity

· General relativity: Relies on artificially curved spacetime geometry – a phenomenological fit.
· MOC: Relies on multiple independent local inertial origins plus curvature-field coupling – a structural, intrinsic cause. No need to assume spacetime curvature or modify the gravitational formula; just changing the origin-architecture paradigm fully explains the precession.

V. One-sentence summary

In the MOC paradigm:
Mercury’s perihelion precession is not because spacetime is curved, but because the Sun and Mercury each have their own independent local origins – and the continuous coupling of their dual-origin curvature fields produces a tiny perturbation per orbit, accumulating naturally into the observed drift of the perihelion.